13 Jan
I realize I am negatively paraphrasing their marketing slogan but the change is quite appropriate after reviewing the packaging of an order they just shipped to us. As a customer, I admit I love Staples but as a provider of eco-friendly packaging products, and as a citizen of the earth, they are very disappointing. I am sorry Staples, but picking and packing an order while utilizing sustainable packaging products and procedures, quite frankly, has never been easier.
Complainants Exhibit A and B

The photo above shows the three items we ordered whose combined volume is 582 square inches. The box they used was a 16” X 10.5” X12.25” high, which provides 2,058 square inches of packing space. Because the box was almost four times larger than it had to be, 600 (un-inflated) square inches of an inflatable void fill product had to be used to fill the oversized void. Before you think this is just another story of a packer using the wrong box to fill an order, the green “wanna be” picture gets much worse for Staples.
“Upon further review”
Staples, you should know that scrutinizing is what we green minded people do. We examine, we question and we point out deficiencies or failed opportunities to make a positive green difference. I could not help but notice the box that was used featured an automatically erecting bottom. One of the key features of this style box is that it usually does not require tape to seal it. For whatever reason, the Staples packager felt it necessary to seal it anyway with a two foot length of 3” wide plastic tape. They also used an identical length to seal the top of the box. Why is the bottom of the boxes taped? Why do they use 3” wide tape when most of the world uses 2” wide tape? There may be some legitimate good reasons for this substantial tape waste but having done hundreds of packaging audits in similar situations, I can tell you the reason is usually something incredibly profound like, “I’m not sure. That is what we’ve always used”.
“But wait, there’s more….”

On a late night TV commercial, that line usually precedes a bonus item designed to make an already incredible offer, even better. In this case, it makes a bad story even worse for Staples. They decided to print an eco message on the box that stated it contained “40% total recycled content/25% post consumer content, minimum”. Simple logic and minimal math skills tell us that the post consumer waste is somewhere between 25% and 40%. Basic sustainability and packaging knowledge tells us that those are not impressive figures for recycled content or post consumer waste. In fact, “minimum” is probably an accurate way to describe Staples green effort.
Before you think this is another shameless plug for our Globe Guard (100% PCW) boxes (which it is) there are MANY boxes out there that are greener than the one Staples chooses to use for their packaging. In today’s eco minded market, 25 to 40% recycled content (PCW or not) is” table stakes” or where the green meter begins measuring results. In any case, this is not the quality of packaging used by a company truly serious about being green.
Meanwhile, back to the void fill
The inflatable bags Staples uses are not particularly green but they are recyclable. Today there are biodegradable, oxo-degradable and formulations that are made of 100% recycled plastic but Staples’ void fill bags are none of the above. The manufacturer however does offer a web address so a Staples customer can theoretically find out where and how to recycle it. How cool and eco friendly is that?
I hate picking on any company, especially one I genuinely like but I think this story makes a legitimate and important point. With apologies to Kermit the Frog but not Staples, today it is easy being green today and it usually reduces cost. All it takes is a little effort and a good supplier.
______________________
Visit the Globe Guard Eco Friendly Packaging Store for -
Eco Friendly Shipping Supplies
Special Deals on Packaging Supplies
and more!
Related Posts:


7 Responses for "For Staples, Eco Friendly Packaging – That ‘s not easy!"
Dennis:
Exemplary and coherent environmental and economic advice to any business! It tells you what’s the right thing to do after close examination (analysis!) because it is economically and environmentally sensible, not because a bunch of people with signs, web pages and/or foundation money say “do it for the planet!”
Bravo – a great demonstration of the difference between “environmentalist” and “enviro-mentalist.”
Mark.
“Enviro-mentalist”, I love it and may use it one day if you don’t mind. I think that tag indicates the difference between doing the right thing and doing the smart thing.
Certainly saving the planet is a smart thing to do but reducing costs, securing and retaining customers and presenting a better/greener corporate image also have tremendous value. Making money and saving the earth can be and must be done simultaniously or it simply won’t work, at least not for very long.
We can always count on our regular readers like you for an insightful and straight forward response.
Thanks Mark and have a great 2009!
Dennis
Awesome review Dennis. I’ve often commented to my wife about the questionable packaging used by giant companies.
Could you review the packaging from Amazon? Are there any companies (like Bad Axe Tools) whose packaging you rate highly?
regards,
Marc
Thank you Marc. If you want to read more about my thoughts on Amazon, please check out by blog on http://www.PackagingDigest.com. There is a new article titled “when green packaging fails” that you may find interesting.
Large companies seem to make more mistakes than smaller companies like Bad Axe because they (big companies) are a victim of their own size and success. They are focused on price and beleive they will get the best deal if they deal direct with the large, packaging product manufacturers. What they lose in the process is the critical objectivity and expereince a multi-product provider can bring to the situation.
FYI, Bad Axe is authentic when it comes to sustainability and it shows. They are probaly one of the most committed companies we have had the pleasure to meet .
Dennis
[...] 15 Oct Staples Packaging Leaves Much to Be Desired Earlier this year, January 13th to be exact, I posted an article complaining about some very eco unfriendly secondary packaging I had received from one of our favorite suppliers, Staples. [...]
In a time when we are trying to save our environment I am curious as to why my 1 page invoice from Staples comes in 4 pages? A cover page, 2 summary pages & a detail page. This is for every order. I would think that a company that talks about “corporate responsibility’ and ‘enviornmental excellence’ would try harder in all aspects. I am disappointed in the blatent disregard.
Thank you for drawing our attention to the problem, Dennis. If you would like to sign a petition asking Hewlett-Packard to reduce packaging waste, go to http://www.thepetitionsite.com/10/campaign-to-reduce-package-waste (a nonprofit, 3rd-party site).
Leave a reply